Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601525›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

The current State of supportive care in cancer: a national survey of healthcare providers and patients by the AFSOS.

Florian Scotté, Mario Di Palma, Cécile Migala, Ivan Krakowski, Marie-Laure De Botton, Cécile Partant, Laure Gueroult-Accolas, Catherine Cerisey, Béatrice Clairaz, Audrey Eche-Gass and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Florian ScottéGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. flscotte@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7478-2086
Mario Di PalmaGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Cécile MigalaClinique Mutualiste de Saint Étienne, Saint Etienne, France.
Ivan KrakowskiInstitut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France.
Marie-Laure De BottonCHU Lille, Lille, France.
Cécile PartantCentre Hospitalier de Cornouaille, Quimper, France.
Laure Gueroult-AccolasPatients en Réseau, Paris, France.
Catherine CeriseyPatient Partner, Entends-Moi, Lyon, France.
Béatrice ClairazPharmacie Des Verts Coteaux, Chatenay Malabry, France.
Audrey Eche-GassOncopôle Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
Didier MayeurCentre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
AFSOS Survey Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSupportive care in cancer (SCC) has a key role in improving quality of life and outcomes for patients on their cancer journey. The aim of the study was to assess improvements in supportive care organization in France.

methodsA prospective, non-interventional (observational), multicentric, national, quantitative study was conducted in France in a two-part mirror survey of healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients with cancer. Participants were recruited using different channels and completed a digital questionnaire. The data was collected on the LimeSurvey software platform between 9 October and 6 December 2023.

resultsA total of 1259 HCPs and 2660 patients completed the survey. Most HCPs (87%) reported that their institution had some form of dedicated SCC organization, most as a dedicated division/department and/or a cross-functional organization. Ten to 15% of HCPs report not providing the essential services of psychological, nutrition, pain management and social worker support as defined by the National Cancer Institute. There was a disparity between HCPs' and patients' reports of the support offered and received, respectively, during the various key points during patients' cancer journeys. The five most significant barriers reported by patients to the implementation of supportive care were mainly a lack of visibility and information, followed by cost, distance from home, and ease of access to consultations.

conclusionAlthough the organization of SCC has been growing over the past 20 years, further progress is needed, particularly regarding access to care and the assessment of the needs of patients and their caregivers.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelNeoplasmsSocial SupportAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare providersMultidisciplinaryNational surveyOncologyPatients’ opinionSupportive care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.