Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601513›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2026

Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Intraperitoneal Nebulised Ropivacaine in Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Maria Cristina Rodriguez Roca, Mercedes Lopez Martinez, Maria Elena Civeira Marín, Maria Recarte Rico, Ramon Corripio Sanchez, Maria Carmen Hernandez Gancedo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Cristina Rodriguez RocaORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-6016
Mercedes Lopez MartinezAutonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. mercedes.lopez.martinez@salud.madrid.org.
Maria Elena Civeira Marín
Maria Recarte Rico
Ramon Corripio Sanchez
Maria Carmen Hernandez Gancedo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraperitoneal administration of local anaesthetics (IPLA) is commonly used in laparoscopic surgery as part of multimodal analgesia.

methodsThis CT included 110 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive nebulised ropivacaine either before or after surgery. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at multiple postoperative intervals. Secondary outcomes included analgesic consumption, shoulder pain, oral intake tolerance, early mobilisation, and incidence of nausea and vomiting.

resultsNo significant differences were observed in abdominal pain scores or any of the secondary outcomes between groups, except for reduced shoulder pain 3 hours postoperatively in the postoperative nebulisation group.

conclusionUnder a standardised opioid-free anaesthesia protocol, postoperative pain was minimal and substantially lower than expected. Therefore, the timing of intraperitoneal ropivacaine administration does not appear to be relevant.

Indexed as

AmidesAnesthetics, LocalGastric BypassLaparoscopyPostoperative PainAdultFemaleHumansInfusions, ParenteralMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersPain MeasurementPreoperative CareRopivacaineTreatment OutcomeAmidesAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.