ArticleForensic toxicology2026
Systematic evaluation of derivatization strategies and GC column polarity for reliable GC-MS separation of amphetamine and phenethylamine in putrefied postmortem samples.
Article in Forensic toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe reliable identification of amphetamine in degraded biological samples is often complicated by the presence of putrefactive amines, such as phenethylamine, which exhibit similar physicochemical properties and can interfere with chromatographic separation. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the conditions of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), including derivatization methods and analytical column selection, to achieve effective separation and identification of amphetamine in the presence of phenethylamine.
methodsVarious derivatization approaches, including acylation, alkoxycarbonylation, silylation, and pentafluorobenzylation, were examined in combination with non-polar, slightly polar, and semi-polar GC columns. The chromatographic behavior of amphetamine and phenethylamine, including the retention time, peak shape, and formation of mono- or di-substituted derivatives, was systematically assessed to optimize separation and mass spectral identification.
resultsAlkoxycarbonylation, silylation, and alkylation produced overlapping peaks, mixed derivatives, or unreacted compounds, thereby limiting their reliable identification. Acyl derivatization allowed for effective separation using non-polar and semi-polar columns, with the non-polar column minimizing peak tailing that is commonly caused by high phenethylamine concentrations. Differences in the elution order were observed between column types, and semi-polar columns provided satisfactory chromatographic resolution and high-quality mass spectra, consistent with spectral databases.
conclusionsSuccessful GC-MS identification of amphetamine in putrefied samples requires careful selection of the derivatization chemistry and GC column polarity. Acyl derivatization combined with an appropriate column choice enables reliable separation from phenethylamine, improves spectral quality, and enhances the evidential value of forensic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42601511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.