ArticleNature methods2026
Aligning protein-generative models to experimental fitness with ProteinDPO.
Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aligning protein-generative models to experimental fitness with ProteinDPO.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Steering generative models for protein design: Aligning and conditioning strategies.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological generative models can predict biological functions without task-specific training data but often under-perform specialized models. This is due to a fundamental 'alignment gap', where the rules learned during unsupervised training are not related to the function of interest. Here we demonstrate how to provide task-specific information without losing the general knowledge learned during pretraining by using direct preference optimization to align a structure-conditioned protein language model to preferentially generate stable protein sequences. Our aligned model, ProteinDPO, achieves stability prediction competitive to task-specific models and consistently outperforms unsupervised and fine-tuned versions of the model. Notably, ProteinDPO generalizes beyond its training data to enable stabilization and improved binding affinity prediction of large multichain protein complexes. When applied to stabilization of the hemagglutinin trimer, a primary component of influenza vaccines, ~80% of designs achieve increased or similar stability compared with the native hemagglutinin and up to 32 °C improvements from recently emerged mammalian strains. Our results demonstrate how to augment generative models with biophysical information and, more broadly, provide a general framework for the alignment of biological foundation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.