ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Fully-automated sleep staging for Parkinson's disease and isolated REM sleep behavior disorder.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a key prodromal marker of Parkinson's disease (PD). Video-polysomnography (vPSG) remains the diagnostic gold standard, but manual sleep staging is particularly time-consuming and challenging in neurodegenerative disease. We adapted U-Sleep, a deep neural network, for automated sleep staging in PD and iRBD. A pretrained model (PUB, 19,236 PSGs), was finetuned on multicenter datasets (PACE, CBC: 112 PD, 138 iRBD, 89 controls) and evaluated on a clinical hold-out (DCSM: 81 PD, 36 iRBD, 87 controls). Predictors of staging agreement were analyzed, and low-agreement recordings were blindly rescored. Confidence-based thresholds were applied to enhance REM detection. The pretrained model achieved κ = 0.66 in PACE/CBC, improving to κ = 0.74 after finetuning (p < 0.001). In the hold-out, mean κ increased from 0.60 to 0.64 (p < 0.001). Site-specific finetuning provided minimal benefit. Confidence was a significant predictor of Cohen's κ (p < 0.001). Recordings with low model agreement also showed low human interrater agreement. Applying a confidence threshold increased REM precision from 85 to 95.6%, preserving sufficient REM sleep in 96% of subjects. This publicly available model achieves human-level agreement enabling scalable, standardized PSG analysis with model-derived confidence as a tool for further refinements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.