Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601379›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Environmental context effects on affective and cognitive empathy in virtual reality.

Till Kastendieck, Daniel Huppertz, Heidi Mauersberger, Ursula Hess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Till KastendieckDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel HuppertzBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heidi MauersbergerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ursula HessDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. ursula.hess@hu-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human interaction invariably occurs within a specific context. Although recent research highlights the role of context for emotion communication, the specific influence of the environmental ambience (the setting's atmosphere) is less understood. This study investigated the influence of positive versus negative ambience on both cognitive (emotion recognition) and affective empathy (emotional mimicry). In a laboratory experiment, 75 participants, wearing head-mounted displays with facial EMG sensors, encountered avatars expressing joy or distress (sadness, anger, and disgust) within either pleasant or unpleasant immersive ambiences. As predicted, mimicry was stronger when the expressed emotion matched the ambience. Furthermore, positive ambience enhanced cognitive empathy for sad and happy expressions. These findings show that the ambience of an encounter significantly shapes our empathetic responses to others within that environment.

Indexed as

AffectCognitionEmpathyVirtual RealityAdultAvatarEmotionsEnvironmentFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAffective empathyCognitive empathyEcological validityEmbeddednessEmotional mimicryEmotion communicationEnvironmental contextSituatednessVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42601379
PMCPMC13476244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.