ArticleCommunications engineering2026
Mechanics-informed risk-aware learning for multiaxial structural reliability with Bayesian calibration.
Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable prediction of structural vulnerability under complex multiaxial loading remains challenging due to nonlinear load couplings, imbalanced failure-critical samples, and limited model interpretability. Here, we present a mechanics-informed, risk-aware learning framework integrating polynomial-harmonic feature augmentation, Weibull-based risk reweighting, and a unified Degradation Risk Score that combines stress margins and bolt pretension loss. Demonstrated on a bolted steering-knuckle assembly with finite-element-derived multiaxial load-response data, the framework improves multiple linear regression from R² = 0.37 to 0.96 with a 67% reduction in RMSE, while enhancing robustness and sensitivity in high-risk regimes across ensemble and neural network models. SHAP analysis confirms that physically meaningful multiaxial interaction features dominate predictions, revealing critical load paths associated with structural vulnerability. Finally, Bayesian logistic and Weibull calibration provide a route to link Degradation Risk Score to component-level failure probabilities, enabling probabilistic risk assessment and reliability-centred decision-making in practical engineering systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.