ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable modeling for material transportation process in an industrial cement vertical roller mill.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vertical roller mills (VRMs) dominate cement finish grinding because of their high efficiency and dry operation. However, the interaction among ventilation, fan operation, and pneumatic material transport remains poorly quantified using plant data. In this study, the previously established data-driven Conscious Lab (CL) framework, based on explainable machine learning, is developed to model material transport behavior in an industrial VRM circuit at the Tehran Cement Plant. A total of 1050 operating records collected over eight months under diverse conditions were cleaned and analyzed. Three ensemble algorithms (CatBoost, XGBoost, and Random Forest) were trained to predict two transport-relevant targets, mill fan speed and mill fan power, and were assessed with conventional hold-out splits and nested cross-validation to reduce selection bias. Among the evaluated models, CatBoost delivered the most reliable performance, achieving high predictive accuracy for fan speed ([Formula: see text]) and fan power ([Formula: see text]). Interpretability was ensured through SHAP analysis, which ranked the dominant drivers of each target and revealed nonlinear interactions among differential pressure, grinding pressures, water injection, and feed-related responses. The results highlight the important role of ventilation-related variables, particularly mill fan speed, fan power, and differential pressure, in governing pneumatic transport and circuit stability. The proposed CL framework provides an explainable, operator-oriented tool to support process diagnosis, setpoint decisions, and future development of real-time intelligent control strategies for energy-efficient cement grinding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.