Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601195›Full record

ArticleMedical humanities2026

Transforming biomedical uncertainty: the sociohistorical origins of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

Sally Cross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical humanities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sally CrossCentre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK sally.cross@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0367-4622

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are serious and disabling long-term conditions characterised by uncertainty surrounding their aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. People with ME/CFS struggle to be understood, taken seriously and supported with their illness. At least since the 1990s, ME and CFS have been considered by many to be related, overlapping or synonymous with one another. However, the concepts originated from different sociohistorical contexts. This article disentangles the histories of ME and CFS, roots them in the UK and the USA respectively, and compares how they emerged as medical and scientific objects. Drawing on a critical literature analysis of medical texts between 1950 and 1990, I explore how both ME and CFS materialised through the regulation of uncertainty within biomedical systems. In both cases, uncertainty was transformed into knowledge by systematically obscuring certain aspects of illness. These transformations shaped what could be known about these conditions in the decades to come and may be at the root of the epistemic injustices experienced by patients. Those who campaign for more scientific research into ME/CFS should be wary of the propensity for biomedicine to generate ignorance in the face of these complex conditions. This analysis contributes to a growing body of research on the medical sociology of ignorance, further illustrating the value of uncertainty and ignorance as heuristic tools for understanding the politics of knowledge production within biomedical systems.

Indexed as

HistoryMedical humanitiesPoliticssociologyWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID42601195
PMCPMC7619391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.