Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601181›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie

Safeguarding surgical access through modernized anesthesia care teams: what surgeons should know.

Sally J Bird, Mathew B Kiberd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sally J BirdFrom the Dalhousie University Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Halifax, NS.
Mathew B KiberdFrom the Dalhousie University Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Halifax, NS. mathew.kiberd@iwk.nshealth.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SummaryAnesthesia workforce shortages are an increasingly important contributor to operating room closures and surgical delays. These gaps disproportionately affect rural and regional hospitals, limiting equitable access to surgery. This commentary outlines how Canada can modernize the anesthesia care team (ACT) model to sustain surgical capacity while maintaining patient safety. Anesthesia assistants (AAs), trained professionals working under anesthesiologist supervision, already support perioperative care in many centres but remain underutilized. Standardizing AA credentials, defining supervision based on case conditions rather than fixed ratios, and implementing transparent safety reporting could expand access responsibly. Surgeons, as procedural leaders whose productivity depends on anesthesia workforce availability, should understand the ACT framework and its safeguards. Strengthening collaboration between surgical and anesthesia leadership offers a practical path to preserve access to surgery and reduce wait times without compromising safety.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologistsAnesthesiologyHealth Services AccessibilityOperating RoomsPatient Care TeamPatient SafetySurgeonsCanadaHumans

Identifiers

PMID42601181
PMCPMC13492654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.