Trial reportBMJ open quality2026
Effect of scenario-based simulation on students' learning outcomes and satisfaction in perioperative anaphylaxis: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative anaphylaxis is a rare but complex clinical crisis, with outcomes heavily dependent on prompt and effective management by anaesthesiologists. However, evidence supporting the efficacy of scenario-based simulation (SBS) training in perioperative anaphylaxis management remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SBS versus video-based training (VBT) on learning outcomes and satisfaction among undergraduate anaesthesia students.
methodsIn this prospective randomised study, 84 fourth-year anaesthesia undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University were assigned to either SBS or VBT for perioperative anaphylaxis education. Knowledge assessments were conducted before (pretest) and after (post-test) training. Outcomes included post-test scores, student satisfaction (assessed via a 5-point Likert scale) and performance in a simulated clinical scenario 1 week later. Scenario performance was evaluated using a technical checklist and the Anesthesiologists' Non-Technical Skills scoring system.
resultsBaseline characteristics (age, sex and pretest scores) were comparable between groups. The post-test scores were higher in the SBS group than those of the VBT group (80.0 (73.7
conclusionsSBS demonstrates greater efficacy than VBT in improving anaesthesia students' learning outcomes, including technical and non-technical skills in managing perioperative anaphylaxis, with higher student satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.