ArticleBMJ open2026
Understanding potentially avoidable emergency department visits in older adults: a survey with healthcare professionals across in- and outpatient care in Sweden.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOlder adults with multiple long-term conditions account for a large share of emergency department (ED) visits and up to 25% may be avoidable. Efforts to reduce such visits show mixed results, likely due to multiple caregivers and limited adaptation to local contexts. We explored factors contributing to avoidable ED visits as reported by multiple care providers, focusing on modifiable factors of importance in the design of a sustainable primary care (PC) intervention. DESIGN AND
settingWeb-based survey conducted across six in- and outpatient healthcare providers in Stockholm, Sweden: ED, geriatrics, ambulance services, advanced home-based healthcare, PC and home healthcare (both within and outside regular working hours). Closed-ended questions were analysed descriptively and open-ended questions using qualitative content analysis.
participantsA total of 100 healthcare professionals (nurse assistants, registered nurses and physicians) with at least 6 months of working experience.
resultsAll providers considered potentially avoidable ED visits a major concern, with home care workers seen as the main initiators of ED referrals. One overarching theme was generated-medical and psychosocial complexities in the assessment of older patients with multiple long-term conditions-and four categories of contributing factors: (1) insufficient access to health and social care, (2) poor communication and cooperation, (3) deficient professional competence and geriatric knowledge and (4) unclear responsibility and fragmented care. Five providers highlighted limited access to care as the most demanding concern while PC noted poor communication.
conclusionsAn intervention should combine enhanced home-based care, better collaboration across providers, direct geriatric admissions and targeted training for home care workers. Accounting for differences in provider perspectives in intervention design may enhance feasibility and acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.