ArticleBMJ open2026
Geographical and climatic factors driving regional variation in medical centres for dementia in Japan: a nationwide geocomputational analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesJapan's dementia policies have mandated establishing at least one medical centre for dementia (MCD) in each secondary healthcare area (SHA) and ensure equitable access to specialised dementia care services across regions. This study aimed to identify the geographical and climatic characteristics of MCDs and examine geographical accessibility to MCDs, and to clarify the geographical characteristics of SHAs in which MCDs have not been established, despite the policy that an MCD should be established in each SHA.
designA geocomputational analysis using publicly available geographical datasets
methodsWe conducted a geocomputational overlay analysis of the spatial distribution of the three types of MCDs across areas with heavy snowfall, mountainous areas, agricultural areas, peninsulas and remote islands. We then reviewed prefectural development policies and municipal dementia care pathway documents in SHAs without MCDs. Finally, catchment analysis was performed to estimate geographical accessibility to the nearest MCD in areas where SHAs without an MCD were concentrated. We used the datasets of municipalities, secondary healthcare areas, heavy snowfall, mountainous areas, agricultural areas, peninsulas and remote islands, provided by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and the dataset of MCDs provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
resultsOverall, 509 MCDs were identified nationwide: 109 (19.8%) in areas of heavy or extremely heavy snowfall, 12 (2.4%) in mountainous areas, 72 (14.1%) in agricultural areas, 29 (5.7%) on peninsulas and 11 (2.2%) on remote islands. Of the 344 SHAs, 18 (5.2%) did not have an MCD, encompassing 105 municipalities. The MCDs comprise three categories: 21 core, 388 regional and 100 affiliated centres. While only one core centre (4.8%) was located in an agricultural area, 46 regional centres (11.9%) and 25 affiliated centres (25.0%) were located in agricultural areas. dementia care pathways analysis revealed that these municipalities either did not designate any MCDs (41%), designated MCDs in adjacent municipalities (21%) or listed all MCDs within the prefecture (36%). Municipalities that did not designate an MCD in their dementia care pathways were primarily located in geographically or climatically disadvantaged areas, including heavy-snowfall regions and peninsulas. Catchment area analysis using 30 km driving isochrone from the nearest MCD revealed that mountainous terrain, heavy snowfall and the presence of a large lake limited catchment coverage in municipalities that did not designate an MCD in their dementia care pathways.
conclusionsWhile the nationwide expansion of MCDs has largely achieved regional coverage, gaps remain in geographically disadvantaged areas where SHAs lack an MCD. Future dementia care planning should consider geographical accessibility in addition to administrative coverage to ensure equitable access to specialised dementia services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.