ArticleJornal de pediatria2026
Gene therapy benefits in a small cohort of symptomatic 5q spinal muscular atrophy patients and real world pediatric outcomes.
Article in Jornal de pediatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize clinical outcomes of gene replacement therapy administered after symptom onset in a small group of children with 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and to describe its impact on motor function and supportive care needs in real-world practice.
methodsObservational cohort study with retrospective and prospective data collection at a single pediatric center. Children with molecularly confirmed type 1 or type 2 5q SMA who received onasemnogene abeparvovec and remained in multidisciplinary follow-up were consecutively included. Due to the small sample (n = 7) and patient heterogeneity, analysis was exclusively descriptive.
resultsSeven symptomatic children were evaluated (six type 1, one type 2). After treatment, motor milestones showed localized improvements; all type 1 patients achieved head control and sitting with support, and 83.3% achieved independent sitting. The type 2 patient achieved independent ambulation. Adverse events occurred in 85.7% of patients and were mostly mild to moderate, though one case of thrombotic microangiopathy required dialysis with favorable recovery. Despite motor gains, prior and simultaneous use of other therapies (nusinersen, risdiplam) acted as confounding factors, and most children remained dependent on noninvasive ventilation and gastrostomy.
conclusionsIn this small and heterogeneous cohort, gene therapy after symptom onset was primarily associated with clinical stabilization and limited motor milestone acquisition, while established respiratory and nutritional impairments persisted. These results emphasize the need for realistic treatment counseling and reinforce the importance of early diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.