Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42600614›Full record

ReviewNeuron2026

Unifying the structures of language in a neural population code.

Samuel A Nastase, Zaid Zada, Adele Goldberg, Uri Hasson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel A NastaseDepartment of Psychology and Center for Computational Language Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: snastase@usc.edu.
Zaid ZadaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Adele GoldbergDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

CRCNS: Building and testing computational models of the neural basis of natural communicationR01DC022534 · NIDCD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Uri Hasson · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC022534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have mastered human language in ways that no previous computational system has. While rule-based, symbolic systems sufficed for constrained, well-defined problems, they were not able to accommodate the context-sensitive expressivity of natural language. LLMs instead use statistical learning to encode the diversity of linguistic structures into a unified high-dimensional embedding space. Strikingly, this context-driven, distributed representation closely parallels neural population codes, suggesting that the human language system may have converged on a similar computational strategy. Drawing on a growing body of work at the intersection of artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience, we show that LLMs can serve as cognitively plausible models of the neural computations supporting language in the human brain. We conclude that explaining how language can emerge from neural population codes, in both biological and artificial systems, will not be achieved through the incremental refinement of algebraic-symbolic theories but will demand new theoretical paradigms.

Indexed as

BrainLanguageModels, NeurologicalHumansLarge Language Modelsconnectionismconstruction grammarembedding spacelarge language modelsLLMsneurolinguisticsrepresentational geometrystatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID42600614
PMCPMC13546754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.