ArticleVaccine2026
Clinicians' self-reported HPV vaccination recommendations for sexual and gender minority patients.
Article in Vaccine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere are multiple human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disparities experienced by sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations in the United States (U.S.), including higher rates of some HPV-associated cancers, lower rates of HPV vaccination among certain subgroups, and higher rates of healthcare discrimination.
methodsWe conducted a national cross-sectional survey of U.S. primary care clinicians (physicians and advanced practice providers [APPs]) in 2024 to examine HPV vaccination recommendation practices for SGM patients. Participants responded to a series of six clinical vignettes which varied by patients' sexual orientation, sex assigned at birth, and gender identity.
resultsThe sample (n = 483) was primarily non-Hispanic (93%), White (74%), physicians (56%), and did not practice in a rural/frontier community (70%). Across the vignettes, regardless of patient characteristics, 59-69% reported they would always recommend the HPV vaccine; whereas 9-19% reported they would recommend the HPV vaccine often (50-79% of the time). The vast majority were highly consistent in recommendation likelihood across vignettes. Greater likelihood of recommending the HPV vaccine was observed for APPs versus physicians (p = 0.016), female clinicians versus males (p < 0.001), and non-Hispanic White clinicians versus other racial/ethnic groups (p = 0.006).
conclusionsIn summary, participants generally reported high likelihood of recommending the HPV vaccine, with recommendations differing very little by patient sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.