Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42600166›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

Empowering Educators to Build AI Chatbots in Health Professions Education: Tutorial on a No-Code Design Workflow.

Charlene Xing Le Goh, Eugene Wang, Juanita S M Kong, Judy C G Sng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlene Xing Le Goh *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0009-9431-7095
Eugene Wang *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0002-4575-0270
Juanita S M KongDepartment of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 16 Medical Drive MD3 Level 4, Singapore, 117600, Singapore, 65 65163676.ORCID 0009-0008-7584-6189
Judy C G Sng *Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 16 Medical Drive MD3 Level 4, Singapore, 117600, Singapore, 65 65163676.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-6940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: AI is entering clinical practice faster than health professions curricula can teach it, leaving many educators eager to use AI-based teaching tools but unsure of how to build them. Generative AI chatbots-configured as simulated patients, clinical coaches, or formative assessment partners-offer scalable, interactive practice without any programming, yet most educators lack a structured method for designing and deploying them well. This tutorial provides that method: a practical, platform-agnostic workflow for building no-code AI chatbots using widely available large language model platforms. The workflow is organized in five sequential sections that follow the arc of a design project: (1) defining the educational purpose, learner group, and persona; (2) configuring behavior through the system prompt, graduated information disclosure, and structured feedback; (3) refining the learner experience through communication-style calibration, voice interaction, and curated knowledge documents; (4) adding realism and testing, including AI avatar generation and rigorous pilot-testing; and (5) embedding the tool within the curriculum and governing its use ethically. Each section pairs concrete, copy-ready design steps with the reasoning behind them, drawing on the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework and on established learning mechanisms-deliberate practice, self-regulated learning, formative feedback, and simulation-based learning-so that design choices are pedagogically grounded rather than merely technical. Throughout, 2 locally developed initiatives, the Virtual Integrated Patient and the Depression Avatars project, serve as illustrative implementation examples that motivated specific design decisions. These are presented as feasibility and acceptability experiences, not as evidence of educational effectiveness. The tutorial also addresses when a chatbot is not the right tool, the principal risks (hallucination, automation bias, data privacy exposure, and bias in generated personas), and a practical governance checklist for safe deployment. Although the examples are clinical, the workflow is discipline-agnostic and transferable across higher education. No-code AI chatbots are a feasible, accessible way for educators to build interactive learning tools; rigorous, multi-institutional evaluation using validated instruments remains the essential next step.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHealth OccupationsWorkflowCurriculumGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansAIartificial intelligencechatbotgenerative AIhealth professions educationmedical educationno codeprompt engineeringtutorialvirtual patient

Identifiers

PMID42600166
PMCPMC13476007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.