ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Health System- and Payer-Level Decision-Making Processes Influencing the Adoption and Sustainability of Patient-Facing Digital Health Tools: Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-facing digital health tools such as mobile health apps, wearables, and digital therapeutics have expanded rapidly and show promise for improving chronic disease management. Despite increasing evidence of effectiveness, health systems and payers continue to face challenges integrating these tools into routine care. Objective: This study examined the decision-making processes of health system and payer leaders regarding the adoption and sustainability of patient-facing digital health tools within their organizations. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews between August 2025 and December 2025 with nine senior leaders from a large Midwestern academic health system and affiliated payer organizations, including a provider-owned health plan and a state Medicaid program. Interviews explored digital health adoption decisions, perceived value and fit, barriers, and sustainability considerations, focusing on the adoption of an evidence-based mobile health intervention for alcohol use disorder as a use case. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis with inductive and deductive coding. Results: Four decision-making mechanisms shaped adoption and sustainability decisions: prioritization under organizational constraint, risk mitigation, operational fit, and value determination. These mechanisms describe how leaders navigate limited organizational capacity, reduce uncertainty, and protect against clinical, financial, and operational risks, assess whether tools can integrate within existing clinical and technical systems, and determine whether anticipated and measurable benefits justify adoption and continued organizational support. Conclusions: Adoption and sustainability of patient-facing digital health tools are shaped by dynamic organizational decision-making processes that often remain invisible to patients, clinicians, researchers, and developers. Making these processes visible may help better align digital health tools with the realities of the health care system to support implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.