ArticleTherapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease
Learning curve of two-incision thoracoscopic double valve replacement: Cumulative sum analysis of postoperative outcomes and proficiency in 252 operations from a single high-volume center.
Article in Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the increasing adoption of minimally invasive approaches for valvular heart disease, the learning trajectory for complex thoracoscopic double valve replacement (DVR) remains largely uncharacterized.ObjectivesTo evaluate the learning curve of two-incision thoracoscopic DVR, determine the case threshold for procedural proficiency, and identify independent predictors of major adverse surgical events (MASE).DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsWe evaluated 252 consecutive thoracoscopic DVR procedures performed at a single high-volume center between March 2017 and December 2024. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was utilized to define distinct learning phases. MASE, a composite of mortality, conversion to sternotomy, and reoperation for bleeding, served as the primary clinical outcome. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of MASE.ResultsCUSUM analysis revealed three distinct learning phases: Acquisition (cases 1-67), Acceleration (cases 68-139), and Mastery (cases 140-252). Mean CPB time decreased progressively from 187.5±34.2 to 156.3±27.6 and 138.4±18.9 minutes across the three phases (p<0.001). Concurrently, MASE rates declined significantly from 16.4% in the Acquisition phase to 4.2% in the Acceleration phase, stabilizing at 4.4% during the Mastery phase (p=0.006). A small aortic annulus emerged as the strongest independent predictor of complications (OR 467.483, p<0.001), followed by operations performed during the Acquisition phase (OR 14.564, p=0.007).ConclusionThoracoscopic DVR demonstrates a three-phase learning curve, with technical proficiency achieved after approximately 139 cases. Early procedural implementation requires risk-adapted case selection, specifically avoiding small aortic annuli during the initial experience. Because standard risk models may significantly underestimate mortality in this context, procedure-specific considerations and learning curve position are essential when evaluating candidates for this advanced minimally invasive approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.