ArticleJMIR cancer2026
Understanding Social Media Strategies to Improve Engagement in and Equitable Dissemination of Online Cancer Nutrition Information: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Social media is a common source of cancer information for patients, caregivers, and survivors. Factors influencing engagement with oncology nutrition content on social media are not well-defined, despite the high prevalence of social media use for health information. The impact of bilingual content strategies on that engagement is also poorly understood. Objective: This study aims to describe changes in postlevel engagement on a Facebook page used to disseminate evidence-based cancer nutrition information during the period before and after the implementation of a bilingual, multiformat content strategy and to identify creative and linguistic features associated with audience engagement at the post level. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed 306 Facebook posts from Cook for Your Life over 12 months, comprising 9 months before the strategy change (T1) and 3 months after (T2). Postlevel engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares, and link clicks) and aggregated user demographics were obtained from Meta Business Suite. Trained coders annotated visual and creative features, including branding, post shape, and infographics, as well as topical categories. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count characterized language features. Group differences across time periods were tested using t tests and chi-square tests. Generalized linear models estimated associations between post characteristics and engagement, adjusting for the time period. Results: Users who engaged with oncology nutrition Facebook content (N=10,196) were mostly female (n=9500, 93.2%) participants, over 35 years of age (n=9311, 91.4%), based in the United States (n=6708, 71.4%), and English-language users (n=9419, 93.4%). Engagement tripled from T1 (mean 5.3, SD 4.2) to T2 (mean 17.7, SD 37.9; P<.001). Creative features such as branding and format were positively associated with engagement. Linguistically, there was a shift toward longer sentence structures, simplified vocabulary, increased analytical language, and a decline in emotionally charged and cognitive language in posts during T2. In models controlling for time period, posts that used bilingual content had 1.72-fold higher odds of audience engagement than English-only posts (95% CI 1.05-2.80). Conclusions: Implementing a bilingual, multiformat content strategy may promote engagement with oncology nutrition information on Facebook and enhance the equitable dissemination of health information. The use of creative visual design elements in combination with language that is more analytical and emotionally neutral was associated with higher engagement with educational public health content. Future research should test bilingual language presentation more directly and examine whether exposure to such content influences health beliefs and downstream behaviors across additional platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.