ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Mobile Health in Home-Based Palliative Care: Realist Review of Contextual Factors and Mechanisms Influencing Outcomes.
Review in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The increasing prevalence of chronic illness presents a significant global health challenge due to growing end-of-life suffering. Palliative care is now an essential health service under Universal Health Coverage. Its integration into primary health care and use of mobile health (mHealth) have been recommended to improve access. Objective: This study aimed to synthesize evidence on how mHealth interventions in home-based palliative care work, for whom, and in what context. Methods: This realist review identified global evidence relevant to mHealth interventions for home-based palliative care through searches of 9 electronic databases (ie, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Global Index Medicus), and forward citation tracking of included articles conducted in March 2026. The review followed the 5 key stages of a realist review: scoping the literature to assess what is important about the context of mHealth intervention in home-based palliative care and what mechanisms might be important in how such interventions result in their intended outcomes; articulating the underlying program theory and refining the review scope through consultation with international palliative care experts; conducting iterative searches for and appraisal of relevant evidence; extracting data; and narratively synthesizing the data, prioritized by relevance and rigor to generate conclusions and recommendations. The Framework of Complexity in Palliative Care Context, adapted from Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, was applied to examine the contextual influences and interactions among factors within the multilayered system. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations were developed and iteratively tested to refine the program theory for mHealth in home-based palliative care. Results: A total of 4134 records were identified, of which 422 (10.21%) articles were retained for full-text screening, and 126 (3.05%) studies were included in the final synthesis. The contextual factors and mechanisms that positively influence the intended outcomes include (1) alleviating concerns and mitigating perceived threats about mHealth's suitability in palliative care through proper orientation for patients and carers, along with clear guidelines for health care professionals; (2) minimizing infrastructural and technological barriers through user-friendly designs and investment in sustainable models of mHealth for home-based palliative care; (3) engaging diverse stakeholders to ensure mHealth aligns with priority health care needs, user preferences, and the operations of implementing organizations and the wider health care system; (4) streamlining health management information systems through interoperable mHealth systems implemented at different levels of care; (5) enabling access to and regular communication with relevant health care teams; and (6) facilitating access to adequate information to empower users in palliative care services. Conclusions: mHealth interventions can enhance home-based palliative care but must align with local contexts. It is recommended that mHealth interventions ensure safety and comfort, technology competence, tailored communication, empowerment of end users, family involvement, health care worker motivation, and system integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.