ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy of Median Nerve Stimulation for Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the treatment of cognitive dysfunction after acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a challenge, and novel therapeutic methods are urgently needed. Median nerve stimulation (MNS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has recently shown positive effects in promoting recovery from coma after acute brain injury. It has been shown to improve cognition in healthy volunteers, and may be a potential therapeutic approach for cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute TBI. Objective: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of MNS for cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute TBI. Methods: This study is designed as a prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, sham-controlled, randomized pilot study. Thirty adult patients with cognitive dysfunction after TBI will be enrolled and randomized to either the stimulation or sham group in a 1:1 allocation ratio. In the stimulation group, MNS is performed on the right wrist (40 Hz, pulse width 300 µs, 20 s on/40 s off, 8 hours per day). The sham group will receive stimulation using an identical device set to deliver 0 mA. Feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy will be evaluated at 1 and 3 months after the injury. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed via recruitment, adherence, retention, and participant-reported acceptability using Likert scales. These measures will be summarized descriptively, and completion rates will be calculated and reported. Safety will be primarily assessed by ascertainment of adverse events from enrollment to 3 months. Further safety assessment will examine side effects using a Likert questionnaire and the impact on peripheral hemodynamic responses. Additionally, the potential efficacy of MNS on cognitive dysfunction will be assessed using multiple cognitive scales; neuroradiological tests, including magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography; and cognitive-related serum biomarkers. Results: Ethics approval was obtained in January 2025, and the trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in February 2026. Participant recruitment is scheduled to begin in July 2026, with completion anticipated in June 2027. Data analysis will commence after completion of follow-up assessments, and study findings are expected to be published in late 2027. Conclusions: This pilot trial will provide preliminary evidence on the feasibility and safety of MNS as a novel intervention for cognitive dysfunction after acute TBI. The results will guide the development of larger-scale trials and optimization of study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.