Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42600061›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the OCODES Digital Strategy in Response to Health Misinformation: Nominal Group Technique and Retrospective Usability Evaluation Study.

Emmanuel Echániz-Serrano, Enrique Ramón-Arbués, José Manuel Granada-López, María Teresa Fernández-Rodrigo, Pedro José Satústegui-Dordá, Eva Benito-Ruiz, María Esther Samaniego-Díaz de Corcuera, Natalia Barrio-Forné, Piedad Gómez-Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emmanuel Echániz-SerranoFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-630X
Enrique Ramón-ArbuésSALUD_SAPIENF Research Group, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-9949
José Manuel Granada-LópezFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-1429
María Teresa Fernández-RodrigoFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-119X
Pedro José Satústegui-DordáFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0083-5940
Eva Benito-RuizFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6170-072X
María Esther Samaniego-Díaz de CorcueraEDU_SAPIENF Research Group, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-3107
Natalia Barrio-FornéEDU_SAPIENF Research Group, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8234-1460
Piedad Gómez-TorresEDU_SAPIENF Research Group, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0045-7871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health misinformation has intensified worldwide, especially in digital environments, where low health and media literacy increase vulnerability. Thus, the MEDIATICH program of the University of Zaragoza launched OCODES (Observatorio Contra la Desinformación en Salud), a participatory digital initiative designed to promote health media literacy and provide evidence-based information through a web platform and social media channels. Objective: This study describes the co-design and development of the OCODES strategy using 2 sequential nominal group technique (NGT) sessions, and assesses its preliminary usability, preliminary user perception, and user engagement after 6 months of activity as a digital initiative developed in response to health misinformation. Methods: NGT1 (n=15) aimed to identify and prioritize interventions to strengthen health literacy through an individual yes or no prioritization process, while NGT2 (n=18) translated selected priorities into concrete digital products, including website structure, social media selection, content lines, and interaction mechanisms. In addition, routine user feedback and website analytics data generated through the OCODES digital channels during the first 6 months of activity were retrospectively examined. Usability was explored using the System Usability Scale (SUS), while preliminary user perception was described through 2 study-specific indicators available in the public feedback tools: perceived usefulness (1-5 Likert scale) and willingness to recommend the website. Google Analytics provided complementary website engagement metrics. Results: NGT-1 generated 11 interventions grouped into four categories. Digital actions were prioritized as the core strategy: a health dissemination portal and social media interventions in the context of health misinformation each achieved 93.3% (14 of the 15 participants) agreement. NGT-2 defined the digital architecture of OCODES, including a central website and presence on LinkedIn (Meta), X (formerly known as Twitter; X Corp), and Instagram (Meta), and established guiding principles such as transparency, scientific rigor, accessibility, and clear communication. A total of 99 adults provided routine usability feedback (65/99, 65.7% women; mean age 44.7, SD 12.54 y). The mean SUS score was 83.10 (SD 10.09), with 94.9% (94/99) achieving adequate usability (SUS ≥68). Perceived usefulness scored 4.52 (SD 0.71), and 97.9% (97/99) of users who provided feedback indicated that they would recommend the site. Web metrics showed 5769 new users, 1935 returning users, 19,003 page views, a bounce rate of 53.32%, a total of 3.28 pages per active user, and 4.95 events per session, indicating strong initial engagement. Conclusions: OCODES is a feasible and well-received digital strategy developed through a participatory, consensus-driven process. Its favorable usability indicators, positive preliminary user perception, and encouraging early engagement metrics support its feasibility. However, the current findings do not provide evidence of effectiveness in reducing health misinformation or improving health media literacy. Future efforts should focus on reaching vulnerable populations, expanding evaluation approaches, and assessing long-term impact.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth LiteracySocial MediaAdultDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studieshealth literacyinformation disseminationmisinformationnominal group techniqueuser-centered designweb-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID42600061
PMCPMC13475788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.