SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Factors influencing vector control for onchocerciasis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Onchocerciasis, commonly known as river blindness, remains a significant public health challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the blackfly serves as its primary vector. This review synthesizes evidence on the factors influencing vector control programs in the region. A search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify factors which influence the successful implementation of vector control programs in sub-Saharan Africa, covering studies published between 1 January 2000 and 31 March 2025, including both experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Study selection was conducted by two reviewers using Rayyan software, disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Quality appraisal was assessed with JBI critical appraisal checklist. Findings were synthesized thematically and narrated. Seventeen studies were included in this review. The review identified several key determinants affecting vector control. Financial constraints were a major barrier, with high start-up and maintenance costs limiting the sustainability of larviciding programs. Community-based interventions, such as the 'slash and clear' method of removing trailing vegetation, were cost-effective but required consistent local commitment. Improper application of larvicides and the emergence of insecticide resistance posed additional challenges, as did environmental factors such as high rainfall and fast river currents, which affected breeding site accessibility and intervention efficacy. The success of vector control programs for onchocerciasis in Sub-Saharan Africa is influenced by several factors which requires enhanced investment, community engagement, and technical capacity building for the long-term success of onchocerciasis elimination efforts in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.