ArticlePloS one2026
The effects of dietary iron supplementation on bacterial infections in Manduca sexta larval hemolymph.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iron is an essential nutrient for all types of organisms, including insects and the microbes that infect them. We predicted that insects fed an iron-supplemented diet would accumulate more iron in their hemolymph, and, because infectious microbes acquire iron from their hosts, that this extra iron would promote the growth of infectious microbes, possibly resulting in larval death. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effects of dietary iron supplementation on infection outcomes in Manduca sexta (tobacco hornworm). Larvae were fed an artificial diet, with or without antibiotics, or the same diets supplemented with 10 mM iron. Control and iron-treated larvae were inoculated with non-pathogenic Escherichia coli or the entomopathogenic Enterococcus faecalis, and bacterial load and larval survival were measured. We found that dietary iron supplementation increased the iron content of hemolymph by approximately 20-fold; however, contrary to our prediction, this increase in iron did not result in an increase in the bacterial load (i.e., infection intensity) of either E. coli or E. faecalis. The effect of iron supplementation on survival was more complicated. As expected, for larvae inoculated with nonpathogenic E. coli, iron supplementation had no effect. For larvae inoculated with E. faecalis, the effect of iron supplementation depended on whether antibiotics were present in the diet. Without antibiotics, iron supplementation prolonged larval survival; with antibiotics, iron supplementation decreased larval survival. The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that dietary iron supplementation increases infection intensity in M. sexta. Instead, the results support the viewpoint that the relationship between dietary iron and infection outcome is complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.