ArticlePloS one2026
Predictive analytics for supply chain resilience in urban infrastructure networks using graph convolutional networks.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban infrastructure networks underpin modern supply chain operations, yet their vulnerability to disruptions poses significant challenges to urban resilience; understanding and predicting such disruptions requires analytical frameworks that jointly leverage network topology and flow dynamics. This study proposes a three-stage framework integrating complex network analysis, Graph Convolutional Network (GCN)-based predictive modeling, and resilience stress testing, validated on a large-scale New York City dataset comprising 6,302 infrastructure nodes, 96,641 disruption events, and 100,000 traffic flow records. The proposed GCN model achieves an RMSE of 5.8 and R2 of 0.92, significantly outperforming ARIMA, SVR, LSTM, and XGBoost baselines, with ablation experiments confirming that graph structure reduces prediction error by 29.3%. Resilience analysis reveals that targeted hub-node attacks cause rapid initial fragmentation, while a crossover effect at approximately 30% node removal shows that random failures induce greater cumulative damage. Temporal factors and historical flow patterns are identified as the dominant predictors, collectively accounting for 65.5% of feature importance. The integrated framework bridges flow prediction and resilience assessment, enabling identification of dual-risk nodes for prioritized infrastructure protection and providing actionable insights for enhancing urban supply chain resilience.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.