ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Navigating technology-facilitated abuse: A participatory action research study with young adults living with HIV and key populations in Kenya.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For young adults living with HIV and key populations, digital platforms are essential tools for accessing health information, services, and navigating stigmatized health needs. However, these technologies expose them to digital harms such as technology-facilitated abuse (TFA). Research on TFA has largely focussed on gender-based violence with limited exploration of experiences of criminalised and stigmatised populations. This paper reports findings from Kenya as part of the Digital Health and Rights Project (DHRP), a four-country study conducted in Colombia, Ghana, Kenya, and Vietnam. The study examined how young adults living with HIV and key populations experience TFA. Data were collected in Nairobi, Mombasa, Kitui, and Migori counties through 16 focus group discussions with 109 young adults aged 18-30 years, including people living with HIV, female sex workers, gay men and other men who have sex with men, and transgender participants, alongside eight in‑depth interviews and six key informant interviews with policymakers, health professionals, and civil society leaders. Data were thematically analysed. TFA included cyberbullying, hacking, blackmail, impersonation, malicious reporting of accounts, and non‑consensual sharing of images or private information. Perpetrators included family members, partners, friends, and strangers, often linked to participants' HIV status, sexuality, or online visibility. TFA caused significant emotional, social, and behavioural harms. Participants emphasized the need for digital literacy, stronger data protection, and a responsive criminal justice system. Based on these findings, we propose an expanded intersectional definition of TFA that extends beyond gendered framing to explicitly recognise HIV status, sexual orientation, and gender identity and expression as axes of vulnerability. Our findings highlight the urgent need for rights-based digital governance that moves the burden of protection from individuals to systems, including through decriminalisation, to protect digital rights and wellbeing of young adults living with HIV and key populations in Kenya.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.