ArticlePloS one2026
Traffic monitoring research based on roadside LiDAR-camera target-free wide-area collaborative calibration.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate LiDAR-camera extrinsic calibration is fundamental to roadside multi-sensor fusion for traffic monitoring. Traditional calibration methods usually depend on calibration targets and manual operation, which limits their applicability in large-scale roadside deployments. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes a target-free wide-area calibration method for roadside LiDAR-camera systems. Instead of relying on artificial markers, the proposed method estimates extrinsic parameters directly from natural traffic scenes. It first extracts complementary geometric and structural features from point clouds and images, and then establishes cross-modal correspondences through a confidence-guided coarse-to-fine matching strategy. To improve calibration stability in dynamic roadside environments, temporal consistency is further introduced into the optimization process together with reprojection constraints. Experiments on a self-built roadside dataset demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an average rotation error of 0.185° and an average translation error of 2.36 cm. Compared with representative target-free methods, it provides higher calibration accuracy while preserving practical computational efficiency. The method also shows good robustness under challenging conditions such as low illumination, occlusion, and dense traffic flow, indicating its potential for real-world roadside deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.