ArticlePLOS digital health2026
An economic analysis of postoperative cataract consultation using remote self-assessment.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the potential savings realized by replacing the 4-6 weeks consultation following cataract surgery with remote self-assessment. In addition, we evaluated the costs associated with adverse events (AEs) from a societal perspective and evaluated the current cost of AEs based on published literature and publicly available datasets. We determined the cost reduction when replacing the in-person 4-6-week postoperative consultation visit with remote self-assessment using our previous clinical trial, publicly available healthcare resource databases, and threshold analysis to determine the effect on cost if the incidence of AEs is affected by conducting an online self-assessment. We collected AE probabilities and costs of AEs based on published literature and databases. and performed a threshold analysis to demonstrate the financial impact if the incidence of AEs is altered versus the savings due to replacing the 4-6 weeks in-person consultation with remote self-assessment. Remote self-assessments resulted in an average savings between -€83 and -€92 per patient. Physical consultations were less costly only if >80% of remote self-assessments warranted an in-person follow-up. The mean cost of AEs per patient was estimated to be €16.35 and were attributed primarily to rare but severe complications, including endophthalmitis and retinal detachment. Having patients participate in a remote self-assessment following cataract surgery is expected to reduce costs under a wide range of assumptions. Due to the lack of published data regarding the utility loss due to AEs, quality of life was not included in our analysis; nevertheless, these cost savings should be balanced by the clinical impact of potentially missing relatively rare AEs. These findings contribute to the ongoing discussion regarding appropriate care following cataract surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.