ArticlePloS one2026
Navigating complexity: Evaluating management measures for multispecies snapper-grouper fisheries in the Southeast U.S. Atlantic.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multispecies fisheries are globally common, but typically managed through single-species controls. This situation can result in wasteful discarding, when fish of some species cannot be retained, but fishing effort toward the complex continues. In contrast, managing multispecies fisheries through effort controls can address this shortcoming. In this study, we used a simulation model to examine the effectiveness of various temporal and spatial effort controls applied to the multispecies snapper-grouper fishery in the southeast United States Atlantic. To represent the complex, we chose six species that are most commonly caught by the commercial and recreational sectors. We evaluated the various management scenarios based on performance metrics that quantify effects on spawning biomass, commercial and recreational landings, commercial and recreational discards, and economic indicators for both fishing sectors. These performance metrics were applied to both the species individually and in aggregate. We found that some management approaches were more effective than others, but that no single approach worked best for all species and both sectors. The optimal strategy depends on policy priorities, balancing potential tradeoffs between conservation goals (e.g., increased spawning biomass), harvest objectives (e.g., increased landings, decreased discards), and economic outcomes. Our modeling framework quantifies those tradeoffs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.