ArticlePloS one2026
Determinants of instructional leadership: A survey of public secondary schools.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Instructional leadership is central to teaching and learning processes and is undertaken by academic leaders to promote higher levels of student learning. Despite its recognized importance, students' academic performance in public schools in Nepal remains persistently low, raising concerns about how instructional leadership is practiced in the schools. There is a need for a validated model to implement the required instructional leadership practices in schools. The existing instructional leadership models are primarily Western and not entirely suitable for implementation in Nepal. Therefore, it seemed essential to develop a model by identifying the determinants of instructional leadership in Nepal's local context. Kathmandu, home to the country's largest concentration of public schools, provides a critical context for examining instructional leadership practices. Given this, the present study examined the determinants of instructional leadership in Kathmandu, Nepal. The study employed a quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional research design to examine those factors. The framework for this study is grounded in Hallinger and Murphy's (1985) model of instructional leadership, which serves as the conceptual basis. Using the Classical Delphi method, the model was adapted to develop a measurement scale. At the same time, the study was situated within a post-positivist paradigm, considering that the reality of instructional leadership exists independently. Exploratory factor analysis was then conducted to extract the underlying factors. The findings reveal three major factors influencing instructional leadership: (a) planning, managing, and supervising instructional programs; (b) motivating and developing the competence of teachers and students; and (c) involving parents in the learning process. The inclusion of parental involvement emerged as a novel dimension in Nepal. These results provide meaningful insights for school head teachers, other educational stakeholders, government policymakers, and international researchers interested in instructional leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.