Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599733›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

Changes in Outpatient and Telehealth Visits Among Undocumented Patients.

Rahael Borchers, Francesco Sergi, Robert Rodriguez, Shaokui Ge, Elaine C Khoong, Melanie Molina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahael BorchersDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Francesco SergiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Robert RodriguezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Riverside.
Shaokui GeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Riverside.
Elaine C KhoongDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Melanie MolinaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Anti-immigration policies in 2025 may influence outpatient care and telehealth among immigrant communities. Understanding visit patterns is essential for health systems leaders to prepare for shifts in health care use and ensure preventive care. Objective: To compare outpatient in-person and telehealth visit completion rates among patients classified as likely undocumented and those likely with legal status, before and after 2025 federal immigration policy changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed electronic health record data from outpatient encounters in a public safety-net system. Documentation status was approximated using non-English primary language without a Social Security number (SSN) to classify patients with likely undocumented status and using English primary language with SSN for patients likely with legal status. Analyses compared visits from January to June 2024 and January to June 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included the number of in-person visits, in-person visit completion (show) rate, and telehealth visit proportion as a percentage of total outpatient visits. Mixed Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for completed outpatient visits and telehealth visit counts by month, comparing both proxy groups. Results: This study analyzed 184 541 outpatient visits in 2024 (48.7% females, 51% males, 0.2% other sex) and 182 573 outpatient visits in 2025 (49.8% females, 49.9% males, 0.3% other sex). During both 6-month periods, patients classified as likely undocumented had 15% higher in-person visit completion rates compared with patients likely with legal status (IRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13-1.16). However, month-specific analyses found that in-person visit completion rates decreased in 2025 among likely undocumented patients, with decreases ranging from 5% to 12%, and significant decreases in March 2025 (IRR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93) and June 2025 (IRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99) compared with 2024. The relative proportion of telehealth visits increased by 12% among likely undocumented patients between 2024 and 2025 (IRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.20) and decreased among patients likely with legal status (IRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Among more than 367 000 visits, there was no clinically significant change in total visits for either group between 2024 and 2025 (IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that patients classified as likely undocumented had higher in-person visit completion rates than patients likely with legal status, but experienced month-specific decreases, which may correspond to increased immigration enforcement activities. Their increased telehealth use underscores its importance as a critical access pathway. Health systems leaders should anticipate shifts in care use and safeguard outpatient access by expanding telehealth supports for immigrant communities.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareTelemedicineUndocumented ImmigrantsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42599733
PMCPMC13476845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.