Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599704›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Age and Endometrial Cancer Survival Disparities Among Black and White Insured Patients.

Elizabeth J Suh-Burgmann, Holly Finertie, Haoyuan Zhong, Claudia Nau, Julie A Schmittdiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth J Suh-BurgmannDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Pleasanton, California.
Holly FinertieDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Haoyuan ZhongDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Claudia NauDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Julie A SchmittdielDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Black patients with endometrial cancer have nearly twice the mortality of White patients with endometrial cancer, but it is unclear if the disparity differs by age, independent of insurance status. Objective: To compare, in a large cohort of insured patients, the disparity between Black and White individuals in survival for patients aged younger than 65 years vs those age 65 years or older and to assess the association of age with excess mortality among Black patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study looked at comparative data from a community-based integrated health care system for Black and White patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2022. Data were analyzed between June 2025 and January 2026. Exposure: Black and White race. Main Outcomes and Measures: The disparity in 5-year mortality between Black and White patients was first assessed among patients younger than 65 years and those 65 years and older. The degree to which the gap in mortality in each age strata was accounted for by demographic, comorbid, tumor, treatment, and socioeconomic characteristics was further assessed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for these factors. To test whether age modifies the association between Black race and excess mortality, interaction terms between race and age were examined. Results: From a sample of 13 585 patients, 11 530 White individuals and 2055 Black individuals, 6543 (48.2%) were younger than 65 years of age at diagnosis and 7042 (51.8%) were aged at least 65 years. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death among Black patients compared with White patients was 2.59 (95% CI, 2.21-3.03) for patients younger than 65 and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.40-1.73) for those aged at least 65 years at diagnosis. Comorbidities, tumor characteristics, treatment, and socioeconomic status accounted for the disparity among older patients (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.97-1.24), but among younger patients some of the disparity remained unexplained (adjusted HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49). Factors more associated with mortality among younger vs older Black patients were high-grade nonendometrioid disease (aHR, 6.09; 95% CI, 4.75-7.81 vs aHR, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.94-3.97) and distant disease (aHR, 8.38; 95% CI, 6.56-10.71 vs aHR, 4.97; 95% CI, 4.31-5.72). The adjusted hazard for mortality for Black women compared with White women was larger among patients younger than 65 years compared with older patients (multiplicative scale: aHR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.18-1.75). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 13 585 insured Black and White patients, the racial disparity in endometrial cancer survival was 43% larger among younger patients, associated with greater racial imbalances in the risk of adverse tumor types and distant disease, although some of the disparity remains unexplained.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanEndometrial NeoplasmsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesWhiteAgedAge FactorsCaliforniaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Disparities in Health

Identifiers

PMID42599704
PMCPMC13476839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.