ArticleCurrent protocols2026
Comparison of Core Stabilization Exercises versus Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Current protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by impaired neuromuscular control, reduced postural stability, and functional deficits. Core stabilization exercises (CSE) are widely used but may have limitations in coordinated, multi-muscle activation. Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS), based on developmental kinesiology, seeks to restore neuromuscular control by engaging integrated diaphragm and core muscle activation. Despite their clinical use, direct comparative evidence between CSE and DNS in NSCLBP remains scarce.
objectiveTo compare the effects of DNS and CSE on pain, lumbar muscle electromyography (EMG) activity, balance, posture, kinesiophobia, and quality of life in patients with NSCLBP Methods: This study will include two parallel groups. A total of 34 participants aged between 20 and 50 years diagnosed with NSCLBP will be recruited on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The participants will be divided into two groups: (1) DNS with interferential therapy (IFT) and hot pack (n = 17) and (2) core stabilization exercises with IFT and hot pack (n = 17). The intervention will be given 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures will include pain intensity, EMG activity of erector spinae and multifidus muscles, balance, posture analysis, kinesiophobia, and health-related quality of life. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and post-intervention.
resultsNormality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Baseline differences will be analyzed by independent samples t-tests, and intervention effects by mixed-design ANOVA. DISCUSSION: Both DNS and CSE are expected to improve pain, neuromuscular activity, balance, posture, kinesiophobia, and quality of life. Comparing objective outcomes across groups will identify which intervention offers greater clinical benefit.
conclusionThis trial will provide evidence to guide clinicians in selecting the most effective exercise intervention for NSCLBP rehabilitation. © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.