ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
CT-based multi-threshold calcium scoring for aortic valve assessment: comparable predictive performance across HU thresholds in a pre-TAVI cohort.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine whether higher Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds for computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcium (CT-AVC) scoring provide additional hemodynamic or discriminatory value beyond conventional 130-HU Agatston scoring in classical high-flow/high-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS). This single-center retrospective cohort included 63 consecutive pre-TAVI patients with trileaflet, classical high-flow/high-gradient severe AS. CT-AVC was quantified on non-contrast ECG-gated CT at 130, 200, 500, 800, and 1000 HU within a manually defined leaflet/annulus region of interest, excluding left ventricular outflow tract and mitral annular calcification. Associations with peak gradient, mean gradient, and aortic valve area were assessed using correlation and multivariable linear regression.Exploratory ROC analysis assessed discrimination of very severe hemodynamic burden, defined as a mean gradient ≥ 60 mmHg, within the established severe-AS cohort, with ROC areas compared using DeLong testing. CT-AVC at all HU thresholds was independently associated with higher peak gradient (β, 0.010 at 130 HU to 0.144 at 1000 HU; all P ≤ 0.005) and higher mean gradient (β, 0.0059 at 130 HU to 0.073 at 1000 HU; all P ≤ 0.024). Associations with aortic valve area were not statistically significant. Within-cohort discrimination of very severe hemodynamic burden was modest and comparable across thresholds (AUC 0.65-0.67), with no statistically significant difference by DeLong testing (P = 0.68). In classical high-flow/high-gradient severe AS, CT-AVC demonstrated consistent associations with transvalvular gradients across HU thresholds. Higher HU thresholds did not outperform conventional 130-HU scoring and showed only modest, comparable performance for within-severity hemodynamic stratification. These thresholds should be interpreted as complementary densitometric analyses rather than alternative diagnostic cut-offs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42599631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.