ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Differences in Community Recognition of Autism Between Special Education and Clinicians: Insights From Public Health Surveillance in Arizona.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePublic health surveillance of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) relies on identifying the condition in educational and/or clinical contexts. However, the criteria used to operationalize ASD for special education exceptionality and for clinical diagnosis emphasize different features of the condition. This study examined whether educational and clinical methods of community recognition of ASD identify the same children.
methodsData from the Arizona site of the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (n = 873) were used to assess (1) associations between record source availability and community recognition of ASD, (2) agreement between special education exceptionality and ICD-based clinical identification, and (3) sociodemographic predictors of community recognition category using multinomial regression.
resultsHaving multiple record sources was associated with recognition of ASD through both educational and clinical systems. Among children with both education and clinical records, agreement between special education exceptionality and ICD coding was minimal (Cohen's κ=-0.001). Special education exceptionality demonstrated moderate sensitivity but low specificity relative to ICD coding. Distinct sociodemographic patterns characterized recognition pathways, with children residing in higher social vulnerability areas more likely to be identified through special education exceptionality only. Non-Hispanic African American children were significantly more likely to be identified through a single-system recognition pathway rather than through both educational and clinical systems.
conclusionEducational and clinical systems identify overlapping but systematically different subsets of children with ASD. These differences in community recognition have important implications for public health surveillance and highlight the influence of institutional frameworks on how autism is identified in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42599627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.