ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Molecular therapy for papillary craniopharyngioma: a multi-institutional analysis of practice patterns across the RAPID Consortium.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTargeted therapy for BRAF V600E mutant papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP) has been rapidly accepted, though given the rarity of the tumor, there is limited guidance for appropriate use. Here, we retrospectively evaluated current practice patterns for the implementation of targeted therapeutics and their outcomes in the treatment of papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP).
methodsPractice patterns at the institutions in the Registry for Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) for treatment of BRAF V600E mutated PCPs using targeted therapy were evaluated. Baseline clinical and demographic variables were retrospectively recorded. Imaging response was evaluated. Dosing, treatment course, adverse events (AEs) and other therapeutic strategies employing BRAF/MEK inhibitors were studied. Adjuvant and/or salvage therapies, including radiation and surgery were recorded.
resultsMost patients demonstrated at least partial response to BRAF and/or BRAF/MEK inhibition (13/19, 72.2%). No patients progressed through therapy. Grade 0-2 AEs occurred in 79% of cases, and nine (47.4%) patients eventually discontinued therapy. Radiation-sparing regimens demonstrated similar radiographic response rates and had smaller residual tumor volume after treatment completion (23.7 vs. 612.4 mm
conclusionCritical insights into molecular therapeutic practice patterns for treatment of PCP were identified. Radiation-sparing, mono-therapeutic, and prolonged treatment duration are feasible options and warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.