ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer chemotherapy despite the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), is used to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, a small subset of patients still develops FN. This study aimed to assess the real-world incidence of FN and identify potential risk factors in this specific population.
methodsThis retrospective study included breast cancer patients who received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis at Tokyo Medical University Hospital between February 2019 and December 2024. Inclusion required pegfilgrastim use at least once during chemotherapy. FN was defined as an absolute neutrophil count below 500/µL (or a predicted ANC below 1,000/µL) and an axillary temperature 37.5 °C or higher. Cases of FN and associated risk factors were analyzed using logistic regression models.
resultsThis study included 378 patients (median age 53). Tumor subtypes were luminal (50.0%), HER2-positive (20.9%), and triple-negative (29.1%), with dose-dense regimens being the most common (55.8%). Of 2,784 total chemotherapy administrations, pegfilgrastim was used in 2,125 cycles (76.3%). The incidence of FN despite pegfilgrastim was 2.1% (8/378), with the highest rate observed in immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing regimens (9.1%, 2/22). Multivariate analysis identified a low baseline platelet count as a significant independent risk factor for combined FN and grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99; P = 0.02).
conclusionAlthough pegfilgrastim is effective, FN still occurs in a small percentage of patients. A low baseline platelet count was associated with an increased risk of FN or severe neutropenia despite pegfilgrastim prophylaxis, though this finding requires confirmation in larger studies given the limited number of events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42599616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.