Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599609›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2026

Review of Neurovascular Reconstruction During Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Veronica S Zhang, Shirley L Wang, Benjamin Schurhamer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veronica S ZhangDivision of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Shirley L WangDivision of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Shirley.wang@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Benjamin SchurhamerDivision of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis manuscript provides a narrative review of techniques of neurovascular reconstruction during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). RECENT

findingsHistoric techniques of neurovascular reconstruction, including autologous nerve grafting and neurorrhaphy, have been shown to be feasible in patients in early pilot studies. More recently, perinatal tissue allografts have been studied, with studies supporting earlier recovery of potency or continence. We review historic experimental techniques which are less frequently employed, including nerve grafting and end-to-end nerve anastomosis. More recently, perinatal tissue allograft wraps placed over the neurovascular bundles (NVB) have been demonstrated to be feasible, requiring minimal additional operative time. Existing studies demonstrate earlier return to potency or continence for men with good preoperative function. While further prospective research is needed to validate these findings, this represents a feasible method which may accelerate recovery for men undergoing RALP.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPlastic Surgery ProceduresProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleNerve graftNeurorrhaphyNeurovascular reconstructionPerinatal tissue allograftsRobotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID42599609
PMCPMC13476334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.