ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2026
Biomechanical effects of varying intrusion-to-retraction ratios on anterior tooth displacement during extraction space closure with clear aligners: an iterative finite element analysis.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using finite element analysis, the present work examined the three-dimensional biomechanical responses of anterior and posterior teeth to a range of intrusion-to-retraction ratios during anterior space closure with clear aligners after extraction of a maxillary first premolar. A three-dimensional model of a maxillary first premolar extraction case was built, comprising the upper dentition, periodontal ligament, aligner, and attachments. The intrusion-to-retraction ratio was altered in a stepwise manner to define seven groups (C0-R6), and movement was reproduced through an iterative simulation of alveolar bone remodeling. For anterior and posterior teeth alike, three-dimensional displacement, change in tooth angulation, and the torque-loss-per-posterior-displacement (TL/PD) ratio were quantified. As the ratio rose, anterior crown displacement generally shifted from extrusion toward intrusion. Compared with C0, the 1:1 intrusion-to-retraction ratio reduced crown extrusion by 59.5% in the central incisors and 81.4% in the lateral incisors while maintaining distal displacement of all anterior teeth. The central incisors shifted to mesial displacement in the R3, R5, and R6 groups, indicating reduced retraction efficiency, and began to tip labially at R5. In contrast, distal displacement was maintained in the lateral incisors up to R5 and the canines across all groups. In the posterior segment, mesial crown movement shifted to distal movement from R2 onward, although the associated vertical responses differed among the posterior teeth. Variability in the TL/PD ratio was greatest for the central incisors, whereas the lateral incisors and canines remained comparatively stable. Under the constraints of this finite element study, overly high intrusion-to-retraction ratios lowered retraction efficiency and produced labial tipping, chiefly in the central incisors. Among the evaluated conditions, a 1:1 ratio (the R2 group) showed a comparatively balanced combination of anterior vertical control and space-closure efficiency while maintaining distal displacement of all anterior teeth. This ratio may serve as a biomechanical reference for digital treatment planning during extraction space closure with clear aligners, although clinical validation is required before routine application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.