Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599566›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026

Validation of the Gambling Problem Recognition Scale.

Nolan B Gooding, Youssef Allami, David C Hodgins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nolan B GoodingDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N1N4, Canada. nolan.gooding1@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1058-4778
Youssef AllamiSocial Sciences, School of Psychology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
David C HodginsDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N1N4, Canada.

Funding

Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary 101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambling problem recognition is an understudied construct with theoretical relevance to the behaviour change process. This study is a psychometric validation of the four-item Gambling Problem Recognition Scale (GPRS). A secondary analysis of data from the Addiction Substitution and Natural Recovery longitudinal study was conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses evaluated the fit of the GRPS to a single factor model, Kendall's tau correlations were used to test convergent and divergent validity, and logistic regression was used to evaluated the incremental validity of the GPRS after adjusting for other factors that explain variance in gambling help-seeking. Converging analyses provided evidence of a strong general factor underlying the GPRS, though there is evidence of local dependence between items. Total scores on the GPRS correlated strongly with problem gambling severity, gambling-related harm, and other measures of problem recognition, and more weakly with measures of gambling participation and psychological distress. The GPRS also explains variance in help-seeking above and beyond other relevant factors, such as problem gambling severity. This study provides evidence for the validity of the GPRS as a measure of gambling problem recognition. The availability of an adequate measure for problem recognition facilitates future research regarding this theoretically-relevant but understudied construct. To this end, our findings provide preliminary evidence that problem recognition uniquely contributes to gambling help-seeking and thus, may be implicated in the process of recovery from gambling problems.

Indexed as

GamblingGambling-related harmProblem recognitionPsychometrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.