ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Routine probiotics and outcomes in infants < 29 weeks: a 13-year single-centre cohort with propensity-weighted sensitivity analyses.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotic supplementation in preterm infants has been associated with reduced necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and mortality, but reported effects vary across studies due to heterogeneity in populations, probiotic products, and co-interventions, with limited representation of extremely preterm infants. We performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study of infants born at < 29 weeks' gestation admitted for intensive care between 2012 and 2024 using electronic patient records. After excluding infants who died within the first 7 days and other predefined exclusions, 581 infants were analysed: 79 (13.6%) received no probiotics and 502 (86.4%) received probiotics (two products used sequentially during the study period). Baseline characteristics (gestational age, birthweight, sex, and antenatal steroid exposure) were similar between groups. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and severe NEC, defined pragmatically as NEC requiring transfer for surgical management and/or surgery. Secondary outcomes included culture-positive late-onset sepsis (LOS) and time to full enteral feeds. Associations were examined using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for gestational age, birthweight, sex, antenatal steroid exposure, and calendar year, supported by propensity-score overlap-weighted sensitivity analysis. In-hospital mortality was 4.8% in probiotic-exposed infants versus 13.9% in unexposed infants. Probiotic exposure was associated with lower adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.93; p = 0.036). No clear association was observed with severe NEC or culture-positive LOS.
conclusionIn this 13-year single-centre cohort of infants < 29 weeks' gestation, routine probiotic use was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, while effects on severe NEC and LOS were not clearly demonstrated. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Probiotic supplementation in preterm infants has been associated with reduced NEC and mortality, but results vary across studies. • Prior evidence is heterogeneous, with limited representation of extremely preterm infants and variability in probiotic strains, dosing, and co-interventions. WHAT IS NEW: • In a 13-year single-centre cohort of infants < 29 weeks' gestation, probiotic use was associated with lower in-hospital mortality after adjustment. • No clear difference in severe NEC (surgery/transfer) was observed between probiotic-exposed and unexposed infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42599538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.