ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Adulting in the Current Era: Piloting an Individualized In-Person Congenital Heart Disease Transition Education Program.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) have varying degrees of readiness to transition to adulthood, including CHD knowledge, disease management skills, and engagement in the transition process. The objective of our study was to determine if educational and skill building visits in an individualized in-person transition program were feasible and improved these aspects of transition readiness. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysis of an in-person transition program from 2019 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 14-21 years old with age-appropriate neurodevelopment who had established CHD care for structural, electrophysiologic, or primary genetic cardiovascular disorder. CHD knowledge, transition skills, readiness for change, and level of engagement were assessed using a novel knowledge questionnaire, a validated skills questionnaire, and transition team assessment. Multivariate mixed linear regression modeling with repeated measures for those with serial visits assessed for change. 519 patients participated in 714 transition encounters, and 143 encounters were serial visits. Lower scores were associated with non-private insurance, but no association was found with CHD severity. Serial transition visits were an independent predictor of increasing knowledge, skills, transition readiness, and engagement, even when accounting for increasing age (p < 0.05), although the largest effects were after the first visit for most outcomes. Individualized in-person transition programming was feasible, and in those with serial visits was associated with increased CHD knowledge, management skills, and engagement, even in those with structural CHD of great complexity. Future studies should assess whether appropriate transition readiness correlates with improved long-term outcomes in adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42599518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.