ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Real-World Data on the Effectiveness and Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Treat Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria-A Subgroup Analysis from the FORTRESS Study.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis subgroup analysis of the FORTRESS study aimed to evaluate clinical and microbiological outcomes, treatment patterns, and safety of intravenous fosfomycin (FOS)-containing regimens for the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria in a real-world setting.
methodsInterim data from patients treated with FOS for infections due to CR pathogens were analyzed from the ongoing prospective, multicenter, multinational, observational FORTRESS study. Key outcomes included patient demographics, clinical and infection characteristics at baseline, treatment patterns, and indications of FOS use, as well as clinical, microbiological, and safety outcomes. Exploratory Firth univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with successful clinical response.
resultsThe subgroup included 161 patients (median age 60 years, 30.4% female, median APACHE II score 15), of whom 59.6% required intensive care, and 41.6% had sepsis at baseline. The most common indications for FOS therapy were hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia (28.0%), bacteremia/sepsis (26.1%), and complicated urinary tract infections (24.8%). Infections were predominantly caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (62.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28.6%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (17.4%). Carbapenem resistance was mainly mediated by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM). In the majority of patients, FOS was part of a combination regimen (91.3%), with ceftazidime-avibactam being the most frequently used partner antibiotic. Overall, clinical success was achieved in 79.4% of patients, while the successful clinical response and microbiological cure rates were 87.5% and 81.3% at the end of FOS treatment, respectively. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 9.9%. Electrolyte imbalances were the most commonly reported adverse drug reactions, but they were mostly not treatment-limiting.
conclusionsThe real-world data of this subgroup analysis suggest that FOS-containing regimens were associated with generally favorable clinical and microbiological outcomes and acceptable tolerability in patients with severe infections due to CR Gram-negative bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.