ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
The regulatory network of Mfsd2a in cerebral ischemia: a novel time-targeted intervention framework.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral ischemia‒reperfusion injury disrupts blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, a process strongly linked to the downregulation of the lipid transporter Mfsd2a. Prior research has focused on the consequences of Mfsd2a loss; however, a systematic synthesis of its upstream regulatory network is lacking. Here, we propose an integrated "Layered and Phased" (L&P) regulatory model as a new conceptual framework in which acute/hyperacute suppression is driven by rapid stress‑responsive transcription factors and microRNAs, while sustained silencing in the subacute/repair phase (days to weeks) may be consolidated by durable epigenetic reprogramming and potentially modulated by dynamic ceRNA networks. We categorized the evidence supporting each mechanism as strong (directly validated in cerebral ischemia models), preliminary (correlative or extrapolated), or predicted/hypothesized (bioinformatics-based). Based on this model, we propose phase‑specific therapeutic strategies, discuss major translational challenges, and outline how this framework can guide biomarker discovery and patient stratification. This L&P framework presents testable hypotheses regarding phase-dependent regulating switches. We outlined the key experiments required to validate the model and discussed their potential to guide biomarker discovery and time-targeted intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42599352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.