Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599311›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Comparative study of pedicle screw trajectory in scoliosis surgery: freehand technique versus navigated angular guidance using the PYTHEAS Your Guided Trajectory.

David Afonso, Kenny Rozenfeld, Estelle Litzelmann, Sébastien Pesenti, Hadrien Giorgi, Aymeric Faure, Yann Glard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David AfonsoHôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France. d.afonso@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2283-8066
Kenny RozenfeldHôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
Estelle LitzelmannHôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
Sébastien PesentiTimone Children Hospital, Marseille, France.
Hadrien GiorgiHôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
Aymeric FaureHôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
Yann GlardHôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPedicle screw fixation is the reference technique in scoliosis surgery, enabling optimal three-dimensional correction and solid spinal stabilization. However, the risk of screw malposition remains significant, particularly in severe deformities, due to vertebral rotation and pedicle dysplasia. Technological advances such as intraoperative navigation and robotic assistance have consistently been shown to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy but are limited by cost, complex workflow, and intraoperative radiation exposure. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the PYTHEAS Your Guided Trajectory (PYGT) navigated angular guidance system for pedicle screw placement, compared with the conventional freehand (FH) technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective single-center study compared two consecutive cohorts of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for progressive scoliosis. Screw positioning was assessed using intraoperative 3D imaging according to the Gertzbein and Robbins classification (grades A-E). Cortical breaches were qualitatively analyzed to distinguish screw-pedicle size mismatch from true directional errors. A secondary analysis assessed the influence of surgeon experience (Junior < 5 years vs. Senior > 10 years).

results31 patients (mean age 16.3 years) were included, allowing analysis of 635 pedicle screws (317 FH; 318 PYGT). A significantly higher proportion of Grade A screws was observed in the PYGT group compared with the FH group (90.5% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001). Direction-related malposition rates were markedly reduced with PYGT (2.8% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001). No Grade D or E screws were observed in the PYGT group. Surgeon experience significantly influenced accuracy in the FH group but had no impact in the PYGT group.

conclusionThe PYGT system significantly improved radiographic pedicle screw placement accuracy in posterior spinal surgery and reduced directional errors compared with the freehand technique, particularly in deformity surgery. These findings support the technical effectiveness of the system. Further studies are required to determine whether these improvements translate into clinically meaningful benefits. Direct comparative studies with contemporary navigation and robotic systems are also needed to better define the role of PYGT with regard to radiation exposure, operative time, workflow, cost-effectiveness, and clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Retrospective comparative study.

Indexed as

NavigationPedicle screw placementPytheas Your Guided TrajectoryScoliosisSpinal fusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.