Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599151›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Efficacy of rTMS in Post-Stroke Bilingual Aphasia: A Single Case Experimental Design.

Ioanna-Prodromia Siklafidou, Sophie Arheix-Parras, Solene Hameau, Grégoire Python, Bertrand Glize

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ioanna-Prodromia SiklafidouDepartment of physical medicine and rehabilitation, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3277-0743
Sophie Arheix-ParrasInstitut Universitaire des Sciences de la Réadaptation, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Solene HameauSchool of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Grégoire PythonFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bertrand GlizeDepartment of physical medicine and rehabilitation, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of non-invasive brain stimulation in the rehabilitation of bilingual individuals with aphasia following a stroke is understudied. Recent studies show benefits of anodal cerebellar transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in bilinguals, while in monolinguals, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) targeting the motor cortex of the lips seems to be effective in aphasia recovery.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate the effects of inhibitory continuous theta burst rTMS stimulation targeting the right motor cortex of the lips during picture naming task in the second language of a French-English post-stroke bilingual individual.

methodsWe enrolled a single bilingual (PR) exhibiting chronic post-stroke aphasia in both her second language (L2), and first language (L1). In the present study PR engaged in naming tasks three times a week for six weeks, including 2-week baseline, 2-week intervention and 2-week follow-up.

resultsThe results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in naming accuracy in the second language of the patient, as evidenced by visual analysis in both cognate and non-cognate words, as well as, overall language accuracy. Visual analysis revealed a positive improvement in all variables, with the greatest improvements observed in phonology, overall accuracy, and pathological language switching.

conclusionThe stimulation of the motor cortex of the lips resulted in an improvement in naming accuracy in both the first and second language of the participant, despite the possible varying language recovery after stroke. This suggests the possible existence of shared representations of language in the brain, which is likely due to the similarities between the languages. Further studies are required to confirm the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in bilingual individuals with aphasia for deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms influencing these outcomes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject The application of non-invasive brain stimulation in bilinguals with post-stroke aphasia is understudied. Studies have indicated that the cortical organization of each language in bilingual individuals may exhibit overlap particularly in the case of similar languages, leading to a pathological language switching following cerebral lesions. A study by Coemans et al. (2023) demonstrated the efficacy of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in bilingual individuals. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation during a naming task on the second language of a post-stroke bilingual aphasia individual and to gain insight into the cortical organisation of each language. What this study adds to existing knowledge The present study demonstrates the potential of inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the right motor cortex of the lips to enhance picture naming accuracy in both languages and reduce pathological language switching in bilingual individuals with aphasia. The results demonstrate that rTMS not only facilitates recovery in each language but also has a beneficial impact on the cognitive control mechanisms involved in language switching, particularly for cognate words. That suggests that rTMS impacts both the targeted motor areas and broader cognitive networks, thereby providing insights into the bilingual language recovery process and highlighting the benefits of rTMS in bilingual aphasia. What are the clinical implications of this study? The clinical implications of this study indicate that rTMS may serve as a valuable tool for enhancing naming abilities and, consequently, language abilities in bilingual patients, particularly when the two languages exhibit similarities. The results suggest that rTMS targeting the motor cortex of the lip has the potential to simultaneously address linguistic and cognitive aspects of bilingual aphasia by targeting the phonological pathway and brain regions involved in cognitive control and language selection. These findings may assist clinicians in the development of personalized rehabilitation strategies for bilingual individuals with post-stroke aphasia.

Indexed as

AphasiaMultilingualismStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMotor CortexTreatment Outcomebilingual aphasiacross‐linguistic effectsnon‐invasive brain stimulation Single‐case experimental designrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationrTMSstroke

Identifiers

PMID42599151
PMCPMC13475167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.