Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598888›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Sibling chimerism among microglia in marmosets.

Ricardo C H Del Rosario, Fenna M Krienen, Qiangge Zhang, Melissa Goldman, Curtis Mello, Alyssa Lutservitz, Kiku Ichihara, Alec Wysoker, James Nemesh, Guoping Feng and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Census and genetic analysis of the United States marmoset population.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ricardo C H Del RosarioDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-9598
Fenna M KrienenDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-6820
Qiangge ZhangStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States.
Melissa GoldmanDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Curtis MelloDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Alyssa LutservitzDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Kiku IchiharaDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5860-0488
Alec WysokerDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
James NemeshDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Guoping FengStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-277X
Steven A McCarrollDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-8184

Funding

A Molecular and Cellular Atlas of the Marmoset BrainU01MH114819 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FENG, GUOPING · 2017 to 2021
$6.9M
NIH BRAIN Initiative U01MH114819NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH114819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimerism happens rarely among most mammals, but is common in marmosets and tamarins, a result of fraternal twin or triplet birth patterns in which in utero connected circulatory systems (through which stem cells transit) lead to persistent blood chimerism (12-80%) throughout life. The presence of Y-chromosome DNA sequences in organs of female marmosets has long suggested that chimerism might also affect these organs. However, a longstanding question is whether this chimerism is driven by blood-derived cells or involves contributions from other cell types. To address this question, we analyzed single-cell RNA-seq data from blood, liver, kidney, and many brain regions across a number of marmosets, using transcribed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to identify cells with the sibling's genome in various cell types within these tissues. Sibling-derived chimerism in all tissues arose entirely from cells of hematopoietic origin (i.e., myeloid and lymphoid lineages). In brain tissue this was reflected as sibling-derived chimerism among microglia (20-52%) and macrophages (18-64%) but not among other resident cell types (neurons, glia, or ependymal cells). The percentage of microglia that were sibling-derived showed significant variation across brain regions, even within individual animals, likely reflecting distinct responses by genetic-sibling microglia to local recruitment or proliferation cues or, potentially, distinct clonal expansion histories in different brain areas. In the animals and tissues we analyzed, microglial gene expression profiles bore a much stronger relationship to local/host context than to sibling genetic differences. Naturally occurring marmoset chimerism will provide new ways to recognize the effects of genes, mutations, and brain contexts on microglial biology and to distinguish between effects of microglia and other cell types on brain phenotypes.

Indexed as

CallithrixChimerismMicrogliaAnimalsBrainFemalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSiblingsCallithrix jacchusgeneticsgenomicsmarmosetsmicrogliasibling chimerism

Identifiers

PMID42598888
PMCPMC13476068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.