ArticleNucleic acids research2026
DNAreader: accurate prediction of DNA-binding residues in structured and disordered proteins using transformers and contrastive learning.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate predictions of DNA-binding residues (DBRs) in protein sequences facilitate decoding molecular-level mechanisms underlying cellular functions that involve protein-DNA interactions. While dozens of these predictors have been released, they target either structured or intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), and the latter were trained to predict less detailed DNA-binding IDRs rather than DBRs. Given this dichotomy, the structure-trained methods underperform on disordered proteins, and vice versa. Moreover, they suffer from high cross-prediction rates, incorrectly labeling many residues that interact with non-DNA ligands as DBRs. We address these issues by introducing DNAreader, the first predictor specifically designed to predict DBRs in the structured and disordered sequence regions. DNAreader relies on an innovative stacked transformer encoder network that combines batch training and contrastive learning, which substantially boosts predictive performance. Using two low-similarity test datasets, we demonstrate that DNAreader statistically outperforms existing tools, performs well for structured and disordered regions, and produces very few cross-predictions. We also developed the DNAreaderDBIDR module, which accurately predicts DNA-binding IDRs, providing flexibility to identify DBRs within IDRs or to predict entire disordered DNA-binding regions. We release DNAreader as a user-friendly web server at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/DNAreader/, with the corresponding source code at https://github.com/jianzhang-xynu/DNAreader.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.