Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598685›Full record

ArticleHistory of the human sciences

An agenda for the medical humanities and ageing.

Martina Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in History of the human sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martina ZimmermannKing's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4274-6145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pessimism about ageing is grounded in a decline narrative that upholds youth as embodying the productive, independent self. Challenging this narrative is central to age studies and essential to critical gerontology. The medical humanities, by comparison, have not sufficiently engaged with ageing to date. Rapid demographic shifts across the 20th century, partly brought about by medico-technological progress, have led to a growing number of older people with multiple, chronic, and degenerative health conditions. This, I will argue, is where the medical humanities have a duty to intervene, because their purview and potential is different from that of age studies. The social practices to which illness gives rise are the central object of the medical humanities, and bio-psycho-social factors have had a place in this field since its inception. Embedded in a historical account of the relation of the medical humanities to ageing, and an account of the history of age studies, this article asserts that the medical humanities need to invest their discipline-crossing capacity and knowledge base in ageing. They need to integrate the biological reality of ageing into their descriptive practices and accept biomedicine as a constructive agent in their future work on ageing. This will enhance the field's enormous potential, at the level of policy and practice, to improve ageing for all.

Indexed as

age studiesbio-psychosocial approachescritical gerontologymedical humanitiespolicy

Identifiers

PMID42598685
PMCPMC13472493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.